top of page

Styku 3D vs Inbody Scanners

Both Styku 3D body scanner and InBody scanner are advanced tools used to measure body composition, and each has its own unique features and benefits. However, here are a few reasons why some people may prefer the Styku 3D body scanner over the InBody scanner:

  1. Non-invasive: The Styku 3D body scanner is a non-invasive tool that does not require users to disrobe or come into contact with electrodes or other measurement devices, making it more comfortable for some individuals.

  2. 3D visualization: The Styku 3D body scanner generates a 3D model of the user's body, which can be viewed from multiple angles, providing a more comprehensive understanding of body composition.

  3. Higher accuracy: The Styku 3D body scanner uses advanced camera technology to capture high-resolution images of the body, resulting in a more accurate measurement of body composition.

  4. Cloud-based software: The Styku 3D body scanner is connected to cloud-based software that can be accessed from anywhere, making it easier for individuals to track their progress and access personalized recommendations.

  5. Compatibility with other fitness apps: The Styku 3D body scanner is compatible with a variety of popular fitness apps, allowing individuals to integrate their body composition data with their fitness routines.

Overall, while both Styku 3D body scanner and InBody scanner are effective tools for measuring body composition, the Styku 3D body scanner may be a preferred option for some individuals due to its non-invasive nature, 3D visualization, higher accuracy, cloud-based software, and compatibility with other fitness apps.


Featured Posts
Recent Posts
Search By Tags
No tags yet.
Follow Us
  • Facebook Classic
  • Instagram Social Icon
  • Twitter Classic
  • Google Classic
  • Yelp Social Icon
bottom of page